Dear Kelvin,

Thanks for circulating the ToR v3 for comments and thanks to Peter for providing his suggested changes.

APNIC suggested changes are in the attached version 4 document.

With regards to APILP or APIGLP, we prefer with APILP as it is broad and inclusive which can cover a number of topics.

5.1.a
This is a very important and is a very big job but who will do it?


Regards
Sunny

On 6/05/2014 7:02 PM, Kelvin Wong wrote:

Dear Peter, well received. Thanks for your comments and edits!
Circulating to APILP (for now) mailing list.

Regards,
Kelvin

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

*From:* Peter Dengate Thrush <barrister@chambers.gen.nz
<mailto:barrister@chambers.gen.nz>>
*Date:* 6 May, 2014 12:04:40 am GMT+9
*To:* Kelvin Wong <kelvin.wong@icann.org <mailto:kelvin.wong@icann.org>>
*Subject:* *Re: [Apilp_discuss] For discussion: Draft Terms of
Reference for Asia Pacific Internet Leadership Program (APILP)*

Kelvin
I seem to be having trouble posting to the list - please forward this
for me - thanks

regards

Peter


Thanks Kelvin,
This is an excellent start - it seems to have been a productive
meeting at ICANN Singapore, and I am sorry I missed it.

I have made some suggested changes in Version 3 of the document which
I attach.
In proposing these, I note first how much easier it is to critique
other's work than it it is to create it - thanks again for the first
draft, which sets the scene very effectively.

Other than some changes such as numbering and some grammar edits, I
think there could be some productive discussion about a couple of items:

1. The name - as its about Internet Governance, it seems sensible to
me to include that in the name of the document and the name of the
exercise.
Its not just about "Internet Leadership" which is being done in many
areas, of registry management,  law, security etc, but specifically
about IG. I think its healthier to acknowledge and display that focus.

2. I am not accustomed to describing the Asia Pacific area as "APAC",
so started to re-name it AP - but didn't continue....happy to defer if
there is a widespread acceptance of that abbreviation.

3. I am somewhat concerned at the current focus on the domain name
industry: I have highlit the term a few times. I think both that there
is more to the IG topic than that, and also that the domain name
industry can be expected to be busy taking care of itself through such
organisations as APTLD, ICANN and the newly formed Domain Name
Association ( "DNA"). Although I think we need to be careful about
opening the door to an unlimited range of topics, I have added IP
address allocation mechanisms, multistakeholderism, online human
rights, network security and network neutrality as possible topics. In
any event, these should be signals, rather than instructions to those
who will eventually draft the actual curriculum.

4. I have separated out and made clearer the tasks of preparing the
curriculum from preparing business and financial plans to support it.


I hope these suggestion might be thought useful in furthering the
discussion - thanks.

Regards


Peter

_______________________________________________
Apilp_discuss mailing list
Apilp_discuss@apilp.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/apilp_discuss

_______________________________________________
Apilp_discuss mailing list
Apilp_discuss@apilp.asia
https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/apilp_discuss