Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward. ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following: 10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak? ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else? ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this? I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it. We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact. That leaves us with panelists. My starting list is: .ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes: Japan Malaysia India I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants. ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists? ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists. That's it for now. Jim
Dear James, Just a friendly reminder: 10:30-11:00 morning tea break 12:30-14:00 lunch 15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon. Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance. Thanks! Regards, Ping On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info>wrote:
Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
Hi Everyone, I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21. I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event. If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown): 09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng 09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC) 10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC)) 10:30-11:00 -- coffee break 11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side) 12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin) Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to. Jim, wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers? What do you think about the above?... Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well... Edmon From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel Dear James, Just a friendly reminder: 10:30-11:00 morning tea break 12:30-14:00 lunch 15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon. Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance. Thanks! Regards, Ping On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote: Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward. ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following: 10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak? ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else? ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this? I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it. We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact. That leaves us with panelists. My starting list is: .ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes: Japan Malaysia India I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants. ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists? ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists. That's it for now. Jim _______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot. Che-Hoo On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21. I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng 09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC) 10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC)) 10:30-11:00 -- coffee break 11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side) 12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim, wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers? What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break 12:30-14:00 lunch 15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote: Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event? Edmon From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot. Che-Hoo On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote: Hi Everyone, I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21. I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event. If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown): 09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng 09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC) 10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC)) 10:30-11:00 -- coffee break 11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side) 12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin) Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to. Jim, wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers? What do you think about the above?... Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well... Edmon From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel Dear James, Just a friendly reminder: 10:30-11:00 morning tea break 12:30-14:00 lunch 15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon. Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance. Thanks! Regards, Ping On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote: Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward. ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following: 10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak? ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else? ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this? I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it. We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact. That leaves us with panelists. My starting list is: .ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes: Japan Malaysia India I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants. ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists? ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists. That's it for now. Jim _______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first. Che-Hoo On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event? Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21. I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng 09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC) 10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC)) 10:30-11:00 -- coffee break 11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side) 12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim, wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers? What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break 12:30-14:00 lunch 15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote: Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
What do others think? Jim, Please provide your thoughts and suggest how we should complete a rundown for the event. Edmon From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:40 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first. Che-Hoo On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote: The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event? Edmon From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot. Che-Hoo On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote: Hi Everyone, I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21. I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event. If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown): 09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng 09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC) 10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC)) 10:30-11:00 -- coffee break 11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side) 12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin) Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to. Jim, wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers? What do you think about the above?... Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well... Edmon From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel Dear James, Just a friendly reminder: 10:30-11:00 morning tea break 12:30-14:00 lunch 15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon. Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance. Thanks! Regards, Ping On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote: Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward. ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following: 10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak? ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else? ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this? I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it. We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact. That leaves us with panelists. My starting list is: .ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes: Japan Malaysia India I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants. ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists? ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists. That's it for now. Jim _______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
Shrinking to 30 minutes a panel for which we were planning more than 2 hours is quite a change. I'm not sure that's workable. I'm also sensitive to Che-Hoo's point about the target audience's being different. Is it possible to view the overlap in session as a feature? Make the distinction that the APRICOT tutorial is for a technical audience and our session is for management and executives? Does anyone have a sense as to whether or not we could attract an appropriate audience? If we can get the word out soon would this help? Jim -- On February 10, 2011 5:49:46 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
What do others think?
Jim,
Please provide your thoughts and suggest how we should complete a rundown for the event.
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:40 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event?
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21.
I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng
09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC)
10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC))
10:30-11:00 -- coffee break
11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side)
12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim,
wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers?
What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break
12:30-14:00 lunch
15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote:
Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak
Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan
Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
I am good either way. Jim, please help run with it. I believe it would be great to have you fully at the driver seat at least to drive towards making this session happen. Most concerned about getting the speakers here in time, and promoting the session so that we have a good audience :-) Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: James M Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@afilias.info] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 3:04 AM To: Edmon Chung; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Shrinking to 30 minutes a panel for which we were planning more than 2 hours is quite a change. I'm not sure that's workable.
I'm also sensitive to Che-Hoo's point about the target audience's being different.
Is it possible to view the overlap in session as a feature? Make the distinction that the APRICOT tutorial is for a technical audience and our session is for management and executives?
Does anyone have a sense as to whether or not we could attract an appropriate audience? If we can get the word out soon would this help?
Jim
-- On February 10, 2011 5:49:46 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
What do others think?
Jim,
Please provide your thoughts and suggest how we should complete a rundown for the event.
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:40 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event?
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21.
I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng
09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC)
10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC))
10:30-11:00 -- coffee break
11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side)
12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim,
wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers?
What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break
12:30-14:00 lunch
15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote:
Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak
Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan
Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
It's already Feb 12. It's just 9 days away. Che-Hoo On 12 Feb 2011, at 12:35 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
I am good either way. Jim, please help run with it. I believe it would be great to have you fully at the driver seat at least to drive towards making this session happen. Most concerned about getting the speakers here in time, and promoting the session so that we have a good audience :-) Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: James M Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@afilias.info] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 3:04 AM To: Edmon Chung; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Shrinking to 30 minutes a panel for which we were planning more than 2 hours is quite a change. I'm not sure that's workable.
I'm also sensitive to Che-Hoo's point about the target audience's being different.
Is it possible to view the overlap in session as a feature? Make the distinction that the APRICOT tutorial is for a technical audience and our session is for management and executives?
Does anyone have a sense as to whether or not we could attract an appropriate audience? If we can get the word out soon would this help?
Jim
-- On February 10, 2011 5:49:46 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
What do others think?
Jim,
Please provide your thoughts and suggest how we should complete a rundown for the event.
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:40 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event?
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21.
I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng
09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC)
10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC))
10:30-11:00 -- coffee break
11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side)
12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim,
wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers?
What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break
12:30-14:00 lunch
15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote:
Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak
Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan
Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
Yoneya-san from JPRS is confirmed. to be ok to speak at the session. Jim, any update for a full proposed agenda? we are only a week away... :-) Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:36 AM To: 'James M Galvin'; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'sc@dnssec.asia' Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
I am good either way. Jim, please help run with it. I believe it would be great to have you fully at the driver seat at least to drive towards making this session happen. Most concerned about getting the speakers here in time, and promoting the session so that we have a good audience :-) Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: James M Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@afilias.info] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 3:04 AM To: Edmon Chung; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Shrinking to 30 minutes a panel for which we were planning more than 2 hours is quite a change. I'm not sure that's workable.
I'm also sensitive to Che-Hoo's point about the target audience's being different.
Is it possible to view the overlap in session as a feature? Make the distinction that the APRICOT tutorial is for a technical audience and our session is for management and executives?
Does anyone have a sense as to whether or not we could attract an appropriate audience? If we can get the word out soon would this help?
Jim
-- On February 10, 2011 5:49:46 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
What do others think?
Jim,
Please provide your thoughts and suggest how we should complete a rundown for the event.
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:40 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event?
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21.
I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng
09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC)
10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC))
10:30-11:00 -- coffee break
11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side)
12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim,
wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers?
What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break
12:30-14:00 lunch
15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote:
Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak
Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan
Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
Edmon, There seems to be some confusion with JPRS. Did you ask for someone to speak on Wednesday for you? I also asked for someone to speak on Monday. I get the impression they are going to choose one or the other. Who else are you contacting for Wednesday? We should probably avoid too much overlap if we can. Jim -- On February 13, 2011 5:22:00 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
Yoneya-san from JPRS is confirmed. to be ok to speak at the session.
Jim, any update for a full proposed agenda? we are only a week away... :-)
Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:36 AM To: 'James M Galvin'; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'sc@dnssec.asia' Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
I am good either way. Jim, please help run with it. I believe it would be great to have you fully at the driver seat at least to drive towards making this session happen. Most concerned about getting the speakers here in time, and promoting the session so that we have a good audience :-) Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: James M Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@afilias.info] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 3:04 AM To: Edmon Chung; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Shrinking to 30 minutes a panel for which we were planning more than 2 hours is quite a change. I'm not sure that's workable.
I'm also sensitive to Che-Hoo's point about the target audience's being different.
Is it possible to view the overlap in session as a feature? Make the distinction that the APRICOT tutorial is for a technical audience and our session is for management and executives?
Does anyone have a sense as to whether or not we could attract an appropriate audience? If we can get the word out soon would this help?
Jim
-- On February 10, 2011 5:49:46 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
What do others think?
Jim,
Please provide your thoughts and suggest how we should complete a rundown for the event.
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:40 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event?
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21.
I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng
09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC)
10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC))
10:30-11:00 -- coffee break
11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side)
12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim,
wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers?
What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break
12:30-14:00 lunch
15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote:
Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak
Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan
Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
I just asked JPRS as mentioned before (for Monday morning). And also asked OGCIO (office of government chief information officer) to provide someone for a welcome remarks. Those are the only 2. Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: James M Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@afilias.info] Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 9:44 PM To: Edmon Chung; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Edmon,
There seems to be some confusion with JPRS. Did you ask for someone to speak on Wednesday for you? I also asked for someone to speak on Monday.
I get the impression they are going to choose one or the other.
Who else are you contacting for Wednesday? We should probably avoid too much overlap if we can.
Jim
-- On February 13, 2011 5:22:00 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
Yoneya-san from JPRS is confirmed. to be ok to speak at the session.
Jim, any update for a full proposed agenda? we are only a week away... :-)
Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:36 AM To: 'James M Galvin'; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'sc@dnssec.asia' Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
I am good either way. Jim, please help run with it. I believe it would be great to have you fully at the driver seat at least to drive towards making this session happen. Most concerned about getting the speakers here in time, and promoting the session so that we have a good audience :-) Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: James M Galvin [mailto:jgalvin@afilias.info] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 3:04 AM To: Edmon Chung; 'Che-Hoo CHENG' Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Shrinking to 30 minutes a panel for which we were planning more than 2 hours is quite a change. I'm not sure that's workable.
I'm also sensitive to Che-Hoo's point about the target audience's being different.
Is it possible to view the overlap in session as a feature? Make the distinction that the APRICOT tutorial is for a technical audience and our session is for management and executives?
Does anyone have a sense as to whether or not we could attract an appropriate audience? If we can get the word out soon would this help?
Jim
-- On February 10, 2011 5:49:46 PM +0800 Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> wrote regarding RE: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel --
What do others think?
Jim,
Please provide your thoughts and suggest how we should complete a rundown for the event.
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:40 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
My impression is that Tutorial is very technical targeting technical engineers while your session is more for awareness/concept targeting more general audience so the matching is a bit strange. If you really want to pursue, I'd suggest you talk to Jonny Martin <jonny@jonnynet.net> first.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 5:29 PM, Edmon Chung wrote:
The timing may be tight though, and joining forces seems to be able to bring more interested audience to the event?
Edmon
From: Che-Hoo CHENG [mailto:chehoo@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:44 PM To: Edmon Chung Cc: 'Ka Ping Wong'; 'James M Galvin'; sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
You're in fact stepping into APRICOT's domain which is not recommended. The easier way to solve this is to request APRICOT-PC to change the timing of DNSSEC Tutorial to other time slot.
Che-Hoo
On 10 Feb 2011, at 1:23 AM, Edmon Chung wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just realized that there seems to be a conflict with a very related tutorial: http://www.apricot-apan.asia/program/dnssec for Monday Feb 21.
I think we should discuss with the instructors and APRICOT folks to integrate this with our event.
If so, I would suggest the following (integrating their tutorial rundown):
09:00-09:25 -- Opening Remarks: Vint / Charles Mok / HK Gov representative / Che Hoo Cheng
09:25-10:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial intro parts (Problems with DNS / The basics of DNSSEC)
10:00-10:30 -- Joint Panel with Tutorial (Registry-registrar aspects / Status today: Moderated by hil Regnauld (NSRC) and Hervey Allen (NSRC))
10:30-11:00 -- coffee break
11:00-12:00 -- DNSSEC tutorial (How to sign DNS data / Operational Aspects / What isn't solved / Application side)
12:00-12:30 -- Closing Panel (moderated by Jim Galvin)
Would suggest we invite the same set of people we were looking to.
Jim,
wonder if you have reached out to anyone to invite them as speakers?
What do you think about the above?...
Also, we need some work on the Wednesday Feb 23 workshop as well...
Edmon
From: dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org [mailto:dnssec_oc-bounces@dotasia.org] On Behalf Of Ka Ping Wong Sent: Monday, February 7, 2011 11:34 AM To: James M Galvin Cc: sc@dnssec.asia Subject: Re: [DNSSEC-OC] [DNSSEC-SC] 21 February DNSSEC Summit - the panel
Dear James,
Just a friendly reminder:
10:30-11:00 morning tea break
12:30-14:00 lunch
15:30-16:00 afternoon tea break
Sorry, due to the long Chinese New Year holiday, Yannis, should be back online soon.
Please feel free to let us know if you need any assistance.
Thanks!
Regards, Ping
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, James M Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote:
Except for Edmon there have not been any comments on my proposal for the Monday AM Summit. I am still interested in any comments or suggestions folks have but I will continue to move forward.
ACTION to Yannis: Please tell us when the morning coffee break is actually schedules on Monday. With that information we can finalize the overall time schedule. We have 2 1/2 hours. I'm modifying my previous proposal to the following:
10-20 minutes opening remarks, including Vint Cerf 30-60 minutes of position statements 30 minute break 45-75 minutes of interactive discussion 5-10 minutes of closing remarks
ACTION to Edmon: How much time did you want to allow for Vint to speak?
ACTION to Edmon: This is a .ASIA event so someone from .ASIA should open this event, presumably you. Will it be you or do you want to arrange for someone else?
ACTION to Edmon: As moderator I could summarize and close but it would also be good for .ASIA to close. How do you handle this?
I have proposed two related themes for this summit: some lessons learned in the form of why "I" did it and what it took to get it done, and a look at the future of the value "I" expect to get from it.
We will then take questions from the audience. I suggest collecting written questions during the break. I suggest we allow questions to come written in Chinese (is this sensible) and thus we'll need someone available to translate questions. As moderator, I will ask all questions and keep the discussion moving. My current plan is not to take questions from the floor in real-time, although we can continue to allow written questions to be brought to the front for consideration. This suggestions I'll need a person available to help manage the contact.
That leaves us with panelists.
My starting list is:
.ASIA needs to be represented - will this be you Edmon? .ORG should be represented - Lance Wolak
Suzanne Woolf - from ISC she represents Bind, a root server operator, she's a member of SSAC and RSAC, she's RSAC liaison to the ICANN Board, she's active in the IETF
What I would like to do at this point is identify DNSSEC folks from the region. This includes:
Japan
Malaysia India
I would also like to suggest we include one or two of the .ASIA Friends and Family participants.
ACTION to everyone: Is this a reasonable set of panelists?
ACTION to Edmon: I'll need some suggestions from you for regional panelists.
That's it for now.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
_______________________________________________ Dnssec_sc mailing list Dnssec_sc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_sc _______________________________________________ Dnssec_oc mailing list Dnssec_oc@mail01.dotasia.org https://mailman.dotasia.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssec_oc
participants (4)
-
Che-Hoo CHENG -
Edmon Chung -
James M Galvin -
Ka Ping Wong