- Tld_discuss - DotAsia Mailman List Manager

[Tld_discuss] How to give feedback to APAC staff before APAC Space
by Yu-Chuang Kuek 25 Jun '15

25 Jun '15

Hi all, As discussed, here is the link to post feedback if you wish. https://community.icann.org/display/gseasiawkspc/Asia+Pacific+Community+Feed back Regards, Kuek From: tld_discuss-bounces(a)tld.asia [mailto:tld_discuss-bounces@tld.asia] On Behalf Of jane Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 6:26 PM To: Jia-Rong Low; discuss(a)tld.asia Cc: ICANN APAC Hub Subject: Re: [Tld_discuss] CWG-Stewardship 2nd Draft Proposal - Translated versions available - a topic for discussion at the APAC space? Dear all: Thanks Jia-rong to coordinate on this. It’s been quiet in the mailing list, but we did get some input from our private conversation. Thanks everybody for the thoughtful input. Here are some key points we could discuss based on the feedback we got so far: 1. Are some policies/practices obstructing market innovation? 2. Are some policies/enforcements not capable of stopping abusive behaviour? 3. How can/should policies/practices/enforcements be managed to avoid advantaging abusers? If you have any thoughts/ideas on those topics, please speak out to share it in APAC space. Also if there’s any new development/projects in your organization you would like to do a update in APAC space, please let us know too. Or if there’s any issue in policy or practice you would like to raise, please volunteer yourself too. Best regards Jian 发件人: Jia-Rong Low <jiarong.low(a)icann.org> 日期: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:50:36 +0000 至: "discuss(a)tld.asia" <discuss(a)tld.asia> 抄送: ICANN APAC Hub <apachub(a)icann.org>, Pam Little <pam.little(a)zodiac-corp.com>, jane <jian(a)registry.asia> 主题: Re: [Tld_discuss] CWG-Stewardship 2nd Draft Proposal - Translated versions available - a topic for discussion at the APAC space? Dear all, Our APAC Space session in Buenos Aires has been confirmed for Thurs, 25 June 10-1130am Buenos Aires time, at Retiro B room. The session details, and broad agenda is listed at the following link: https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/thu-apac-space. Please feel free to give your inputs on issues to discuss so that Jane can put together the detailed agenda; and also to fill in the APAC Hub questionnaire on any pain points you might have (see email below). Just for info we will be availing dial-in for the APAC space. We will share the details once they are available. Thank you. Regards, Jia-Rong From: Jia-Rong Low <jiarong.low(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, 22 May, 2015 11:25 AM To: Pam Little <pam.little(a)zodiac-corp.com>, 'jane' <jian(a)registry.asia>, "discuss(a)tld.asia" <discuss(a)tld.asia> Cc: ICANN APAC Hub <apachub(a)icann.org>, Save Vocea <save.vocea(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Tld_discuss] CWG-Stewardship 2nd Draft Proposal - Translated versions available - a topic for discussion at the APAC space? Thanks Pam. Jane – can I trouble you to include Savé (copied) into the mailing list too please? FYI too all - I've submitted a meeting slot for Thursday morning (25 June). Will share the details once the programme is confirmed. And a gentle reminder to all regarding our questionnaire to feedback on your point points to be discussed at ICANN53 APAC Space. Just fill in the very simple form at: https://community.icann.org/display/gseasiawkspc/Asia+Pacific+Community+Feed back Thank you. Regards, Jia-Rong From: Pam Little <pam.little(a)zodiac-corp.com> Date: Friday, 22 May, 2015 10:22 AM To: 'jane' <jian(a)registry.asia>, "discuss(a)tld.asia" <discuss(a)tld.asia> Cc: ICANN APAC Hub <apachub(a)icann.org>, Jia-Rong Low <jiarong.low(a)icann.org> Subject: CWG-Stewardship 2nd Draft Proposal - Translated versions available - a topic for discussion at the APAC space? Jane & All I suppose “it is better late than never” but would like to propose this as a topic for discussion at the APAC space at ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires. I hope my interest in the IANA Stewarship Transtion and concerns over the timing of making translated versions available to non-Enlgish speaking stakeholders are shared by others. Regards, Pam From: ICANN APAC Hub [mailto:apachub@icann.org] Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 11:52 AM To: ICANN APAC Hub Subject: CWG-Stewardship 2nd Draft Proposal - Translated versions available Dear friends and colleagues, The CWG-Stewardship 2nd draft proposal has been translated. All translated documents are posted on the CWG-Stewardship wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/DoQ0Aw and on the public comment page here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04 -22-en. An excerpt of the announcement on the public comment page is appended here for your convenience: > > Due to the late availability of the translated versions of the proposal, those > who are reliant on these translated versions to provide input will have the > ability to submit their comments until 26 May at 23:59 UTC. For these > submissions, CWG-Stewardship requires a covering note explaining that the > comments were dependent on the translated versions. For any other submissions > the existing deadline of 20 May at 23:59 UTC applies. For any questions, > please email grace.abuhamad(a)icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org> . >> >> > > 鉴于本提案的译文版本发布较晚，那些需要依靠阅读译文才能提交意见的社群提交评论截止时间现推迟为 > 世界协调时 5 月 26 日 23:59 。“CWG——管理权”跨社群工作组要求推迟提交评论的社群在材料首页附上 > 一份声明，表明该评论参考译文版而提出。其他评论的提交截止时间仍旧为世界协调时 5 月 20 > 日 23:59 。如有其他疑问，请发送电子邮件至：grace.abuhamad(a)icann.org > <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org> 。 Thank you, Philadel on behalf of ICANN Asia Pacific Hub Email: apachub(a)icann.org <applewebdata://D538F1BB-A7B5-45AA-8BBC-68A88B027E33/apachub@icann.org> Subscribe: If this email has been forwarded to you and you wish to receive news, updates and announcements from us directly, kindly reply to this email with the text "subscribe me" in the subject line. Unsubscribe: If you no longer wish to receive any mailers from us, please reply to this email with the text "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

1 0

Re: [Tld_discuss] APAC space in ICANN Buenos Aires
by Jia-Rong Low 22 Jun '15

22 Jun '15

Thank you Jian for leading this; dear all, As staff, we are very happy to facilitate the APAC space and I am very proud of this community-led initiative! Looking forward to the discussion here on the topics to be discussed at Buenos Aires. As was discussed at and later announced after the APAC space meeting in Singapore, we have established a platform on our ICANN Community Wiki for you to give us your feedback on "pain points". An example was translation issues with regard to the RAA. It was agreed to have this consolidated feedback flashed and discussed at Buenos Aires. So I would like to point you to our page again so that we can start consolidating any pain points you might have. The form is very simple to fill and can be accessed at: https://community.icann.org/display/gseasiawkspc/Asia+Pacific+Community+Feed back The above can be one of the agenda items for the BA APAC Space please (but if there's no feedback we won't be able to discuss this). In the meantime, I am working to block a meeting room and time slot for the APAC Space. Thank you all once again. Regards, Jia-Rong From: jane <jian(a)registry.asia> Date: Tuesday, 21 April, 2015 5:36 PM To: "discuss(a)tld.asia" <discuss(a)tld.asia> Subject: [Tld_discuss] APAC space in ICANN Buenos Aires Dear all: Thanks for attending APAC space event in Singapore. It was very productive discussion. Thanks everyone to share the information with us. The feedback from the audience is very positive, and let’s continue our event in ICANN Buenos Aires. It’s time to start our discussion to prepare the event. Any topics, issues, opportunities to collaborate together, you want to raise and share in the event, or you have any suggestions on the event, please don’t hesitate to share in this mailing list. This is our event, this is our space, let's make good use of it. Looking forward to hearing from you soon! Jian Zhang

2 2

[Tld_discuss] CWG-Stewardship 2nd Draft Proposal - Translated versions available - a topic for discussion at the APAC space?
by Pam Little 19 Jun '15

19 Jun '15

Jane & All I suppose “it is better late than never” but would like to propose this as a topic for discussion at the APAC space at ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires. I hope my interest in the IANA Stewarship Transtion and concerns over the timing of making translated versions available to non-Enlgish speaking stakeholders are shared by others. Regards, Pam From: ICANN APAC Hub [mailto:apachub@icann.org] Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 11:52 AM To: ICANN APAC Hub Subject: CWG-Stewardship 2nd Draft Proposal - Translated versions available Dear friends and colleagues, The CWG-Stewardship 2nd draft proposal has been translated. All translated documents are posted on the CWG-Stewardship wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/DoQ0Aw and on the public comment page here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-0…. An excerpt of the announcement on the public comment page is appended here for your convenience: Due to the late availability of the translated versions of the proposal, those who are reliant on these translated versions to provide input will have the ability to submit their comments until 26 May at 23:59 UTC. For these submissions, CWG-Stewardship requires a covering note explaining that the comments were dependent on the translated versions. For any other submissions the existing deadline of 20 May at 23:59 UTC applies. For any questions, please email <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org> grace.abuhamad(a)icann.org. 鉴于本提案的译文版本发布较晚，那些需要依靠阅读译文才能提交意见的社群提交评论截止时间现推迟为世界协调时 5 月 26 日 23:59 。“CWG——管理权”跨社群工作组要求推迟提交评论的社群在材料首页附上一份声明，表明该评论参考译文版而提出。其他评论的提交截止时间仍旧为世界协调时 5 月 20 日 23:59 。如有其他疑问，请发送电子邮件至： <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org> grace.abuhamad(a)icann.org. Thank you, Philadel on behalf of ICANN Asia Pacific Hub Email: apachub(a)icann.org <applewebdata://D538F1BB-A7B5-45AA-8BBC-68A88B027E33/apachub@icann.org> Subscribe: If this email has been forwarded to you and you wish to receive news, updates and announcements from us directly, kindly reply to this email with the text "subscribe me" in the subject line. Unsubscribe: If you no longer wish to receive any mailers from us, please reply to this email with the text "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

3 4

[Tld_discuss] APAC space in ICANN Buenos Aires
by jane 21 Apr '15

21 Apr '15

Dear all: Thanks for attending APAC space event in Singapore. It was very productive discussion. Thanks everyone to share the information with us. The feedback from the audience is very positive, and let’s continue our event in ICANN Buenos Aires. It’s time to start our discussion to prepare the event. Any topics, issues, opportunities to collaborate together, you want to raise and share in the event, or you have any suggestions on the event, please don’t hesitate to share in this mailing list. This is our event, this is our space, let's make good use of it. Looking forward to hearing from you soon! Jian Zhang

1 0

[Tld_discuss] APAC Space @ ICANN Singapore, Tuesday 10 Feb, 18:00 19:30
by jane 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Dear friends from the Asia Pacific community: Time flies, it’s been a year since we gathered informally in Singapore during the ICANN Meetings. We had quite a fruitful discussion during our last meeting, and there was good agreement that we should continue forward to share information and explore ways to work more collaboratively together into the future. Once again, thanks to Kuek and the ICANN APAC team, we have obtained space for further meeting. This time in fact, we are officially on the agenda as “APAC space”: Time: Tuesday 10 Feb, 18:00 – 19:30 Location: Moor Room You are all invited (and please pass this on to all others from Asia Pacific too) to the event and to share your ideas, experiences and concerns related to our domain industry. The rough proposed agenda as follows: 1. APAC Registry & Registrar (Domain Industry) Information Sharing Session - market trends - local regulations - ICANN policies (if you are interested to present your experience, please simply respond further on this list) 2. Issues of Common Interest in APAC - ICANN participation ROI - industry overall image - regulatory & policy challenges 3. Development of "APAC Space" - Continuing activities at ICANN - Beyond the ICANN venue 4. Future Activities - next steps between Singapore and Buenos Aires The above is just a starting point to get our discussion going. Please do feel free to jump in to add anything else you think would be relevant. Best regards Jian Zhang

1 1

Re: [Tld_discuss] [~TGW-204-35663]: ICANN Follow-up_Notice Re:Whois_Inaccuracy [Gabia, Inc.] (244) [shampu.net]
by Jang Chang-Ki 23 Jun '14

23 Jun '14

Dear This is Chang-ki Jang working in the Internet Business Team, GABIA, INC. I hope you to guide us specifically to make the information update. If not, this can be endless Ping-Pong Game. as you know the fact, This is the update history of the domain name [shampu.net] And we were sure that it had been corrected through 1 st and 2nd update and confirmation. But you told us it was incorrect. >From the 3rd update, we cannot help updating the INFO with ours(registrar) because we didn’t know and didn’t understand‘ What Was Wrong’. If the format was incorrect, why don’t you pointed out what the format is incorrect specifically. We cannot find out what the format is incorrect by comparing other famous registrar’s format. Let’s complete this situation now. Can you pointed out what information is incorrect or what format is incorrect in the below 1st update’s INFO (Red Color Info)? We are sure the information was correct. If you request to change the correct INFO, What we should do? I think this is not the prolonged issue. Now please guide us or inform us specifically ‘What the information is incorrect or what format is incorrect’ at our 1st Update in the below history. WHOIS Inaccuracy Correction Domain Name orrect.net Domain Name Registrant WOORI KO Contact Name WOORI KO Contact Method Cell Phone / E-mail Contact Telephone Number +82.1062804260 Contact E-mail Address shampunet(a)gmail.com No Contact Name Method Contact Time Begin(Send) Contact Time End(Reply) Result 1st WOORI KO Cell phone +82.1062804260 2014-05-20 13:34 2014-05-20 13:40 We confirmed that the reported inaccuracy was corrected. And We changed the whois information orrectly. 13:44 2nd WOORI KO E-mail shampunet(a)gmail.com 2014-05-28 16:06 14-05-31 01:41 The domain owner confirmed that the WHOIS information is correct by sending Email(shampunet(a)gmail.com). 3rd WOORI KO Cell phone +82.1062804260 2014-06-10 13:21 2014-06-10 13:24 We contacted the owner again by calling his Cell phone. And heard from him that the WHOIS information is correct. As you know the fact this would be third times response. And we didn‘t know what the information in the WHOIS is incorrect. Consequently, we reached an conclusion that only one way was remained, and suggested to change the all the information except TEL from the owner‘s to Gabia. And received the confirmation from the owner. And the result of the update is the 3rd update. That is Gabia‘s information except TEL. 4th WOORI KO Cell phone +82.1062804260 2014-06-13 15:27 2014-06-13 15:30 We contacted the owner again by calling his Cell phone. And asked to update the TEL info also and received and get the confirmation by Cell phone. And also we found out our ZIP code was not matched with the address. So we updated the ZIP code also. Updated Information Classification Orignal 1st Update 2nd Update 3rd Update 4th Update Registrant Street 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU 606-ho, Jaewoo Building, 15 Seokchon-dong, Songpa-gu As we explained, the domain owner ‘WOORI KO’ sent us the Email that the 1st update INFO is correct. 670 Sampyeong-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 670 Sampyeong-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do Registrant Phone +82.2427416 +82.70888342 +82.70888342 +82.28293543 Registrant Postal Code 138220 138-842 152050 463400 Registrant Email shampunet(a)gmail.com <mailto:shampunet@gmail.com> shampunet(a)gmail.com rrinfo(a)gabia.com rrinfo(a)gabia.com Admin Street 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU 606-ho, Jaewoo Building, 15 Seokchon-dong, Songpa-gu 670 Sampyeong-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 670 Sampyeong-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do Admin Phone +82.2427416 +82.70888342 +82.70888342 +82.28293543 Admin Postal Code 138220 138-842 152050 463400 Admin Email shampunet(a)gmail.com <mailto:shampunet@gmail.com> shampunet(a)gmail.com rrinfo(a)gabia.com rrinfo(a)gabia.com Tech Street 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU 606-ho, Jaewoo Building, 15 Seokchon-dong, Songpa-gu 670 Sampyeong-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 670 Sampyeong-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do Tech Phone +82.2427416 +82.70888342 +82.70888342 +82.70888342 Tech Postal Code 138220 138-842 152050 463400 Tech Email shampunet(a)gmail.com <mailto:shampunet@gmail.com> shampunet(a)gmail.com rrinfo(a)gabia.com rrinfo(a)gabia.com Waiting for your reply.. Best Regards, Chang ki, Jang / Internet Business Team / Gabia, Inc -- ---------------------------------------------- TEL : 82-2- 829-3543 FAX : 82-2- 848-6622 E-Mail : rrinfo@gabia.com,partner-support@gabia.com URL: http://www.gabia.com ------------------------------------------------- From: ICANN Compliance [mailto:compliance-tickets@icann.org] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 8:30 AM To: rrinfo(a)gabia.com Subject: [~TGW-204-35663]: ICANN Follow-up_Notice Re:Whois_Inaccuracy [Gabia, Inc.] (244) [shampu.net] Dear Gabia, Inc. (244),    Thank you for your response. Please note that Section 3.7.7 of the RAA states that registrars may only be the Registered Name Holder (RNH) for domain names used to offer registrar services. The Whois data for domain name <shampu.net> should provide contact information for the RNH, not your registrar. To demonstrate compliance, please provide ICANN the following information and records by 27 June 2014: 1. System logs demonstrating the Whois data for <shampu.net> has been updated to reflect the registrant and not the registrar. 2. Once the Whois data has been updated, please demonstrate that the standards described in Section 1 of the Whois Accuracy Program Specification have been applied to: a. Validate the postal address format b. Validate the telephone number format c. Validate the email format Please provide ICANN the requested information and records via reply email (no more than 4 MB total) by 27 June 2014 and do not change the email subject heading. If you do not respond, a notice of breach will be issued against your registrar. Sincerely,    Jonathan Denison   ICANN Contractual Compliance Gabia 도 메인 팀, 답변을 보내 주셔서 감사합니다. 즉, RAA 제 3.7.7 등록 기관은 등록 서비스를 제공하는 데 사용되는 도메인 이름의 등록 된 이름 홀더 (RNH)이 될 수 있다는 주장에 유의하십시오. 도메인 이름 <shampu.net>에 대한 후이즈 데이터는등록 된 이름 홀더(RNH) 연락처 정보화 를 제공 하세요. 준수를 증명하기 위해 ICANN에게 2014년 6월 26일하여 다음과 같은 정보와 기록을보내주세요. <shampu.net>에 대한후이즈 데이터를 시스템 로그를 등록 된 이름 홀더 (RNH) 반영하기 위해 업데이트되게하세요. 후이즈 데이터가 업데이트되면, 후이즈 정확도 프로그램 사양의 섹션 1에 기재된 기준에 적용되어 있는지확인하세요: a. 우편 주소형식의 유효성을 확인 b. 전화 번호 형식의 유효성을확인 c. 이메일 형식의 유효성을확인 2014년 6월 26일에 의해 ICANN에게 회신 메일을 통해 요청 된 정보와 기록 (더 이상 4 이상 MB 총)을 제공하고, 이메일 제목 머리글을 변경하지 마십시오. 만약 응답하지 않을 경우, 위반의 통지는 등록에 대해 실행됩니다. ############################################ The problem summary: Reporter Name: Annie Wood Reporter Email: ann.wood(a)markmonitor.com Domain being reported: shampu.net Time of submission/processing: Wed Apr 30 19:52:53 2014 Problem in whois block: Expiration Date --- Error in date: Nothing to report Problem in whois block: Technical Contact --- Error in address: Incorrect address --- Error in phone number: Nothing to report --- Error in name: Nothing to report --- Error in email: Nothing to report --- Error in fax number: Fax is missing --- Comment: There is no such address: 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU, Seoul, KR, 138220. I have sent several emails to the registrant email address on behalf of my client who owns the trademark that is being infringed upon. Currently this site is selling counterfeit goods and it's essential to remove this content. Problem in whois block: Registrant Contact --- Error in address: Incorrect address --- Error in name: Nothing to report --- Comment: There is no such address: 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU, Seoul, KR, 138220. I have sent several emails to the registrant email address on behalf of my client who owns the trademark that is being infringed upon. Currently this site is selling counterfeit goods and it's essential to remove this content. Problem in whois block: Registration Date --- Error in date: Nothing to report Problem in whois block: Administrative Contact --- Error in address: Incorrect address --- Error in phone number: Nothing to report --- Error in name: Nothing to report --- Error in email: Nothing to report --- Error in fax number: Fax is missing --- Comment: There is no such address: 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU, Seoul, KR, 138220. I have sent several emails to the registrant email address on behalf of my client who owns the trademark that is being infringed upon. Currently this site is selling counterfeit goods and it's essential to remove this content. The whois at the time of processing is: REGISTRAR WHOIS: Welcome to GABIA.COM's WHOIS data service. The Data in Gabia' WHOIS database is provided by Gabia for information purposes, and to assist persons in obtaining information about or related to a domain name registration record. Gabia does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a WHOIS query, you agree that you will use this Data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this Data to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail(spam); or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that apply to Gabia (or its systems). Gabia reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy. Domain Name: shampu.net Registry Domain ID: Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gabia.com Registrar URL: http://www.gabia.com Updated Date: 2012-06-18 Creation Date: 2003-07-18 Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2021-07-18 Registrar: Gabia, Inc. Registrar IANA ID: 244 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse(a)gabia.com Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +82.8293543 Reseller: Domain Status: ok Registry Registrant ID: Registrant Name: WOORI KO Registrant Organization: Registrant Street: 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU Registrant City: Seoul Registrant State/Province: Registrant Postal Code: 138220 Registrant Country: KR Registrant Phone: +82.24274160 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: shampunet(a)gmail.com Registry Admin ID: Admin Name: WOORI KO Admin Organization: Admin Street: 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU Admin City: Seoul Admin State/Province: Admin Postal Code: 138220 Admin Country: KR Admin Phone: +82.24274160 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email: shampunet(a)gmail.com Registry Tech ID: Tech Name: WOORI KO Tech Organization: Tech Street: 28-605 WOOSUNG APTMENT, JAMSIL DONG,SONGPA GU Tech City: Seoul Tech State/Province: Tech Postal Code: 138220 Tech Country: KR Tech Phone: +82.24274160 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email: shampunet(a)gmail.com Name Server: ns.gihc.net Name Server: ns2.gihc.net DNSSEC: URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/ >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2014-05-01 04:00:02 <<< REGISTRY WHOIS: Whois Server Version 2.0 Domain Name: SHAMPU.NET Registrar: GABIA, INC. Whois Server: whois.gabia.com Referral URL: http://www.gabia.com Name Server: NS.GIHC.NET Name Server: NS2.GIHC.NET Status: ok Updated Date: 03-jul-2013 Creation Date: 18-jul-2003 Expiration Date: 18-jul-2021 ############################################ Ticket Details _____ Ticket ID: TGW-204-35663 Department: Whois Inaccuracy Type: Issue Status: 3rd WIP Verify Priority: Normal

1 0

[Tld_discuss] DNS Women Breakfast - Grand Union Bar
by Yannis Li 21 Jun '14

21 Jun '14

Hi All, Just a piece of info to share with ladies who are here in London. The DNS Women breakfast on Monday will be at Grand Union. That is a bar opposite to the venue hotel which is right outside the exit at tower lifts at east wing lobby. See you there if not sooner. =) Best Regards, Yannis Li DotAsia Organisation Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Address: 12F, Daily House, 35-37 Haiphong Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong Tel: +852 2244 7900 ︳Fax: +852 2244 7902 ︳http://www.dot.asia

1 0

Re: [Tld_discuss] [Gabia] Question about
by Howard Li 14 Jun '14

14 Jun '14

Dear Chang-ki The specific requirements for RGP will usually be in the RRA signed between registries and registrars. So first thing is we can check the requirement in a registry��s RRA. If the RRA requires a 30 day RGP, registrar should be abided by that rule. If not, they may have a compliance issue. In another word, if the registry requires a 30 RGP, the registrar should also provide a 30 day RGP. If they only provide 20 day for RGP, they may just breach the contract. Please note, current registries may have different rules on RGP due to historical reasons. And you can find that in the policy. The first sentence of that policy is ��With the exception of sponsored gTLD registries,�� which means currently some gTLDs may have different rules. Hope the above answers your question. If you need more information, please feel free to write me. Best, Howard Li (��) Registrar Services Sr. Manager (ע��̷��߼��) ICANN, APAC From: Jang Chang-Ki [mailto:marchubi@gabia.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:13 AM To: Yu-Chuang Kuek; rrinfo(a)gabia.com; info(a)tld.asia; discuss(a)tld.asia Cc: Howard Li; Hye Young Kang; Kang Soo Song; Liana Teo Subject: RE: [Tld_discuss] [Gabia] Question about Hello Kuek! Thanks for your feedback. But I have already review the ��Expired Registration Recovery Policy��. And I have quoted the passages from that rules like this. I asked a question because the below sentence is vague to a Registrar. Should the Registrar allow 30 days redemption grace period to the Registrant? (We have thought this is right.. but some registrar doesn��t seem to manage the period like that) or Is it OK to manage the redemption grace period within the 30 days ? (In other words, Is it OK for the registrar to allow the redemption grace period only for 20 ?) -------------------And this is ICANN Policy.. But there is no clear sentence for the registrar----------------------------------------------- Redemption Grace Period 3.1. With the exception of sponsored gTLD registries, all gTLD registries must offer a Redemption Grace Period ("RGP") of 30 days immediately following the deletion of a registration, during which time the deleted registration may be restored at the request of the RAE by the registrar that deleted it. Registrations deleted during a registry's add-grace period, if applicable, should not be subject to the RGP. 3.2. During the Redemption Grace Period, the registry must disable DNS resolution and prohibit attempted transfers of the registration. ICANN-approved bulk transfers and permitted partial bulk transfers are not subject to the prohibition of attempted transfers. The registry must also clearly indicate in its Whois result for the registration that it is in its Redemption Grace Period. 3.3. Registrars must permit the RAE to redeem a deleted registration during RGP (if RGP is offered by the respective registry). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Thanks Chang Ki Jang From: Yu-Chuang Kuek [mailto:yuchuang.kuek@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:33 AM To: rrinfo(a)gabia.com <mailto:rrinfo@gabia.com> ; info(a)tld.asia <mailto:info@tld.asia> ; discuss(a)tld.asia <mailto:discuss@tld.asia> Cc: Howard Li; Hye Young Kang; Kang Soo Song; Liana Teo Subject: Re: [Tld_discuss] [Gabia] Question about Hi Mr Jang, Thank you for your query. I believe your query is related to the ��Expired Registration Recovery Policy�� https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/errp-2013-02-28-en A registrar, in order to provide registration service to registrants, must sign the RRA with the relevant registry, in addition to the RAA with ICANN. Thus, more specific rules about RGP, usually are stated in RRA instead of RAA. And rules may vary slightly among registries due to legacy reasons. I am very happy to share that we have Howard who has just joined the ICANN Asia-Pacific Operations looking at registrar services. He is on the CC list and I will leave it to him to give you more details. This is in addition to ICANN colleagues in Seoul �C Kelly and Kang Soo. I hope this is helpful. Regards, Kuek ICANN From: "rrinfo(a)gabia.com <mailto:rrinfo@gabia.com> " <rrinfo(a)gabia.com <mailto:rrinfo@gabia.com> > Date: Monday, June 9, 2014 2:55 PM To: "info(a)tld.asia <mailto:info@tld.asia> " <info(a)tld.asia <mailto:info@tld. asia> >, "discuss(a)tld.asia <mailto:discuss@tld.asia> " <discuss(a)tld.asia <mailto:discuss@tld.asia> > Subject: [Tld_discuss] [Gabia] Question about Dear This is Chang-ki Jang working in the Internet Business Team, GABIA, INC. ICANN Accredited Registrar in South Korea. Really nice to meet you.. This is my first message �� if possible, I would like to give you many questions about gTLDs. Actually I sent an Question Email to ICANN�� But in these days ICANN feedback is really late.. So if it is possible, I would like to talk to you APTLD members and ask for some good advice or information. Let me go to the point directly.. My question is simple. Should the Registrar allow 30 days redemption grace period to the Registrant? (We have thought this is right.. but some registrar doesn��t seem to manage the period like that) or Is it OK to manage the redemption grace period within the 30 days ? (In other words, Is it OK for the registrar to allow the redemption grace period only for 20 ?) -------------------And this is ICANN Policy.. But there is no clear sentence for the registrar----------------------------------------------- Redemption Grace Period 3.1. With the exception of sponsored gTLD registries, all gTLD registries must offer a Redemption Grace Period ("RGP") of 30 days immediately following the deletion of a registration, during which time the deleted registration may be restored at the request of the RAE by the registrar that deleted it. Registrations deleted during a registry's add-grace period, if applicable, should not be subject to the RGP. 3.2. During the Redemption Grace Period, the registry must disable DNS resolution and prohibit attempted transfers of the registration. ICANN-approved bulk transfers and permitted partial bulk transfers are not subject to the prohibition of attempted transfers. The registry must also clearly indicate in its Whois result for the registration that it is in its Redemption Grace Period. 3.3. Registrars must permit the RAE to redeem a deleted registration during RGP (if RGP is offered by the respective registry). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Waiting for your good advice or information ��. Best Regards, Chang ki, Jang / Internet Business Team / Gabia, Inc -- ---------------------------------------------- TEL : 82-2- 829-3543 FAX : 82-2- 848-6622 E-Mail : rrinfo@gabia.com,partner-support@gabia.com <mailto:rrinfo@gabia.com,partner-support@gabia.com> URL: http://www.gabia.com -------------------------------------------------

2 2

Re: [Tld_discuss] [Gabia] Question about
by Yu-Chuang Kuek 10 Jun '14

10 Jun '14

Hi Mr Jang, Thank you for your query. I believe your query is related to the ³Expired Registration Recovery Policy² https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/errp-2013-02-28-en A registrar, in order to provide registration service to registrants, must sign the RRA with the relevant registry, in addition to the RAA with ICANN. Thus, more specific rules about RGP, usually are stated in RRA instead of RAA. And rules may vary slightly among registries due to legacy reasons. I am very happy to share that we have Howard who has just joined the ICANN Asia-Pacific Operations looking at registrar services. He is on the CC list and I will leave it to him to give you more details. This is in addition to ICANN colleagues in Seoul Kelly and Kang Soo. I hope this is helpful. Regards, Kuek ICANN From: "rrinfo(a)gabia.com" <rrinfo(a)gabia.com> Date: Monday, June 9, 2014 2:55 PM To: "info(a)tld.asia" <info(a)tld.asia>, "discuss(a)tld.asia" <discuss(a)tld.asia> Subject: [Tld_discuss] [Gabia] Question about Dear This is Chang-ki Jang working in the Internet Business Team, GABIA, INC. ICANN Accredited Registrar in South Korea. Really nice to meet you.. This is my first message if possible, I would like to give you many questions about gTLDs. Actually I sent an Question Email to ICANN But in these days ICANN feedback is really late.. So if it is possible, I would like to talk to you APTLD members and ask for some good advice or information. Let me go to the point directly.. My question is simple. Should the Registrar allow 30 days redemption grace period to the Registrant? (We have thought this is right.. but some registrar doesn¹t seem to manage the period like that) or Is it OK to manage the redemption grace period within the 30 days ? (In other words, Is it OK for the registrar to allow the redemption grace period only for 20 ?) -------------------And this is ICANN Policy.. But there is no clear sentence for the registrar----------------------------------------------- Redemption Grace Period 3.1. With the exception of sponsored gTLD registries, all gTLD registries must offer a Redemption Grace Period ("RGP") of 30 days immediately following the deletion of a registration, during which time the deleted registration may be restored at the request of the RAE by the registrar that deleted it. Registrations deleted during a registry's add-grace period, if applicable, should not be subject to the RGP. 3.2. During the Redemption Grace Period, the registry must disable DNS resolution and prohibit attempted transfers of the registration. ICANN-approved bulk transfers and permitted partial bulk transfers are not subject to the prohibition of attempted transfers. The registry must also clearly indicate in its Whois result for the registration that it is in its Redemption Grace Period. 3.3. Registrars must permit the RAE to redeem a deleted registration during RGP (if RGP is offered by the respective registry). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Waiting for your good advice or information . Best Regards, Chang ki, Jang / Internet Business Team / Gabia, Inc -- ---------------------------------------------- TEL : 82-2- 829-3543 FAX : 82-2- 848-6622 E-Mail : rrinfo@gabia.com,partner-support@gabia.com URL: http://www.gabia.com -------------------------------------------------

2 1

[Tld_discuss] [Gabia] Question about
by rrinfo＠gabia.com 09 Jun '14

09 Jun '14

Dear This is Chang-ki Jang working in the Internet Business Team, GABIA, INC. ICANN Accredited Registrar in South Korea. Really nice to meet you.. This is my first message . if possible, I would like to give you many questions about gTLDs. Actually I sent an Question Email to ICANN. But in these days ICANN feedback is really late.. So if it is possible, I would like to talk to you APTLD members and ask for some good advice or information. Let me go to the point directly.. My question is simple. Should the Registrar allow 30 days redemption grace period to the Registrant? (We have thought this is right.. but some registrar doesn't seem to manage the period like that) or Is it OK to manage the redemption grace period within the 30 days ? (In other words, Is it OK for the registrar to allow the redemption grace period only for 20 ?) -------------------And this is ICANN Policy.. But there is no clear sentence for the registrar----------------------------------------------- Redemption Grace Period 3.1. With the exception of sponsored gTLD registries, all gTLD registries must offer a Redemption Grace Period ("RGP") of 30 days immediately following the deletion of a registration, during which time the deleted registration may be restored at the request of the RAE by the registrar that deleted it. Registrations deleted during a registry's add-grace period, if applicable, should not be subject to the RGP. 3.2. During the Redemption Grace Period, the registry must disable DNS resolution and prohibit attempted transfers of the registration. ICANN-approved bulk transfers and permitted partial bulk transfers are not subject to the prohibition of attempted transfers. The registry must also clearly indicate in its Whois result for the registration that it is in its Redemption Grace Period. 3.3. Registrars must permit the RAE to redeem a deleted registration during RGP (if RGP is offered by the respective registry). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Waiting for your good advice or information .. Best Regards, Chang ki, Jang / Internet Business Team / Gabia, Inc -- ---------------------------------------------- TEL : 82-2- 829-3543 FAX : 82-2- 848-6622 E-Mail : rrinfo@gabia.com,partner-support@gabia.com URL: http://www.gabia.com -------------------------------------------------

1 0